ETHICAL POLICY AND MALPRACTICE STATEMENT
The major goal of our ethical policy is to maintain scholarly integrity of the journal and to advice our contributors regarding best academic practices in contemporary academic world. We expect our contributors to read this policy before signing a contact with us.For Writers
- The research articles, book reviews and review articles must be an original contribution.
- All sources in the submission must be accurately acknowledged.
- In case, several persons write an article, all should be mentioned in the submission. The misuse of assignments/data of supervisees/students by academics is not acceptable.
- Contributors must avoid including unacknowledged statements/ideas. Plagiarism is considered a crime in today’s academic world. They must acknowledge third party material. Writers should expect that editors and publishers would check plagiarism.
- Provide to the editors and press accurate emails, affiliations, postal addresses and names.
- Writers must indicate any conflict of interest (whether the article is written to benefit any company, business/group or community).
- Writers must take care of the religious and cultural sentiments of communities, they are working on. They must carefully use hate-material for constructing their arguments. They must not promote biases/stereotypes against any community.
- Following the COPE’s advice, we do allow editors and members of the advisory board to publish with the journal through a transparent and rigorous review process. To minimise bias, another associate editor manages the review process independent of his/er colleague.
- Writers should delete self-references or any indications which could reveal their identity to the referees.
- Writers must be ready to fully cooperate in case the editors and publisher demand any source of information. We do not publish articles which mention/quote anonymous sources.
- Writers must be ready to fully co-operate in case of investigation regarding plagiarism.
- Strictly follow the policy of blind review. In case you know the contributor, do not review the paper and send regrets.
- Only accept papers for review which are related to your expertise.
- Return submission form within stipulated time.
- Report any ethical misconduct, plagiarism.
- Accept the responsibility for reviewing the revised drafts.
- Contact with the concerned editor in case of any problem/confusion.
We follow the publication codes and ethics outlined by the COPE available online at http://publicationethics.org/, which are stated here:
1. General duties and responsibilities of editors
- Editors will be accountable for everything published in their journals.
This means the editors will
- strive to meet the needs of readers and authors;
- strive to constantly improve their journal;
- have processes in place to assure the quality of the material they publish;
- champion freedom of expression;
- maintain the integrity of the academic record;
- preclude business needs from compromising intellectual and ethical standards;
- always be willing to publish corrections, clarifications, retractions and apologies when needed.
2. Relations with authors
- Editors’ decisions to accept or reject a paper for publication will be based on the paper’s importance, originality and clarity, and the study’s validity and its relevance to the remit of the journal.
- Editors will not reverse decisions to accept submissions unless serious problems are identified with the submission.
- New editors will not overturn decisions to publish submissions made by the previous editor unless serious problems are identified.
3. Relations with reviewers
- Editors will provide guidance to reviewers on everything that is expected of them including the need to handle submitted material in confidence.
- Editors will require reviewers to disclose any potential competing interests before agreeing to review a submission.
- Editors will ensure that peer reviewers’ identities are protected.
4. Relations with editorial board members
- Editors will provide new editorial board members with guidelines on everything that is expected of them and should keep existing members updated on new policies and developments.
5. Editorial and peer review processes
- Editors strive to ensure that peer review at their journal is fair, unbiased and timely.
- Editors will ensure that material submitted to their journal remains confidential while under review.
If you have any questions regarding this policy, please feel free to contact at firstname.lastname@example.org
Yet there is little official data on the sources of the pollution, or on just how bad the air actually is. In announcing a new antismog policy this month, the Punjab government admitted it had “scant” air quality data, saying only that the official safety limit for PM2.5 particles, 35 micrograms per cubic meter, was “exceeded frequently.”
Naseem-ur-Rehman, a director at Punjab’s Environment Protection Department, admitted that the government had bought six air-quality monitors last year but never installed them — until last week, when a public outcry over the lack of data led to a scramble to set them up across Lahore. He said the department was “closely monitoring the situation,” but as of Thursday it was still not releasing air-quality numbers.
“This is a crisis of data,” said Ahmad Rafay Alam, an environmental lawyer and activist in Lahore. He said six meters were insufficient for a city the size of Lahore, let alone for all of Punjab.
In the absence of official information, some Pakistanis have taken matters into their own hands. One is Mr. Omar, who installed air monitors in Lahore, Islamabad, Peshawar and Karachi, where he lives. He has set up Twitter accounts to post the readings in real time.
Mr. Omar was inspired by his experience living in Beijing, where the American Embassy changed the debate about pollution years ago by publishing air-quality readings on Twitter. The Chinese authorities were ultimately prompted to set up dozens of air monitoring stations in the capital and across China.
“I realized that in order for air quality to become a national conversation in the way it had in China and to raise awareness about hazards and solutions, we needed the numbers to be out there,” said Mr. Omar, whose Pakistan Air Quality Initiative publishes data about air pollution and information about its effects on health.
Mr. Omar’s Twitter updates have prompted many of Lahore’s middle- and upper-class residents to buy air purifiers and don face masks.
Another activist, Aysha Raja, who runs a popular bookstore in Lahore, started a Facebook group called Citizens for Clean Air, to discuss possible solutions to the smog problem and put pressure on the government to address it.
“The political will is missing on the government side,” Ms. Raja said. “We the public need to act as a pressure group, as a watchdog, to make sure that they do something effective.”
The throat-burning, eye-stinging smoke plaguing Punjab has created problems beyond the obvious health concerns. On Tuesday alone, at least a dozen people were killed in road accidents linked to poor visibility in Lahore, according to the police. Major highways have been intermittently closed because of the visibility problems.
Thirteen power plants that run on fuel oil have been shut down since last weekend, and power generation has been cut back at four others, leading to daily outages of more than 12 hours in many urban areas. At one Lahore hospital alone, more than 500 people have been arriving daily with complaints of respiratory difficulties and eye irritation.
“Lahore looks like a dystopian wasteland right now, kind of like a scene from ‘Blade Runner,’” said Adil Ghazi, a business owner.
The Punjab government says it has taken several emergency measures, including a ban on burning crops and solid waste. It says that more than 100 people have been arrested for crop burning and that hundreds of factories have been shut down for not having proper emission-control equipment. The Lahore traffic police say that they have collected more than $50,000 in fines in recent days from drivers whose vehicles did not meet emissions standards and that two centers have been set up for checking commercial vehicles for compliance.
But environmentalists say a real solution would require much more serious measures: improving fuel quality, phasing out fuel-guzzling cars, introducing solar and other renewable sources of energy, planting trees on a large scale and improving public transportation to reduce the number of cars on the roads.
“There is a lot of media interest in the story and public anger right now, so emergency measures are being taken, but a long-term solution doesn’t seem to be a priority,” Mr. Alam said. “The sense of urgency has to be sustained.”
Most important, he said, the government needs to stop looking for others to blame, including India, whose crop fires Pakistani environmental officials have blamed for the worsening smog this year.
“No doubt smoke from crop burning in India is a big problem, but let’s not pretend we don’t have our own part to play in this crisis,” Mr. Omar said. “The government needs to acknowledge the problem and create awareness.”Continue reading the main story